Technical evaluation

Evaluate a zero-knowledge secrets manager on your Windows Server

Request a demo, then test VaultPilot against your deployment model before production. Run representative vault tasks, verify recovery and update trust, and write down every gap that needs another product or a control your team owns.

Illustration: an evaluation board with plan, test, and decide columns

Tell us what the demo should cover

Your request reaches support@vaultpilot.io as one email, and we reply to your work email. The website keeps no copy. Leave out passwords, vault exports, databases, backups, private keys, access tokens, and unredacted screenshots.

All fields are required.

01 · FIT

Check that the deployment and product boundary match your problem

VaultPilot ships as a Windows Server MSI with browser access over HTTPS. It is a self-hosted password and secrets manager. Out of scope: Linux or macOS server packages, Docker, PAM session brokering, SIEM, SSO, and vulnerability scanning.

Compare self-hosted options
Illustration: an evaluation checklist next to a test server and laptop

02 · TRUST AND USE

Follow a secret through create, use, share, audit, and lock

Confirm which payloads are encrypted in the browser, which metadata stays on the server, how roles change vault access, and where plaintext can appear during an authorized workflow. Use synthetic records only.

  • Server session separate from the master-password workflow
  • Extension pairing, share revocation, and the audit entries they leave
Trace the zero-knowledge boundary
Illustration: one secret followed through create, use, share, audit, and lock

03 · OPERATIONS

Test backup and updates before you rely on them

Create the recovery package that fits your scenario and restore it in a test. Verify the release source, the Ed25519-signed manifest, the file's SHA-256 hash, and its size. For v3.0.3, plan for the unsigned MSI instead of assuming signer metadata.

Read the backup and recovery guide